Insect Conservation and Diversity (2011) doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00149.x
Habitat requirements of the endangered beetle Boros
schneideri (Panzer, 1796) (Coleoptera: Boridae)
_ EREŠK IE N E_ and VIDMANTAS KARALIUS
LAIMA BLAŽ YT E-Č
Institute of
Ecology of Nature Research Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania
Abstract. 1. To further knowledge regarding habitat requirements of the threatened
species Boros schneideri, a total of 1522 dead standing Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)
were checked for the presence of B. schneideri larvae. For the 245 trees inhabited by
larvae (16% of all examined trees), tree characteristics and occupancy patterns were
measured.
2. As most of the investigated forests were 40–80 years old and were dominated
by comparatively thin dead trees (5–20 cm diameter at breast height), B. schneideri
larvae were mainly found under the bark of trees with a diameter in the range of
10–20 cm. However, the probability of a tree being inhabited by B. schneideri
increased progressively with tree diameter and forest age.
3. Most of the trees with B. schneideri (79%) were in medium-dense and sparsegrowth pine forests where the canopy cover was 60–80%. The presence of Norway
spruce (Picea abies) in Scots pine forests was an important factor affecting the probability of trees being inhabited by B. schneideri. Only 6% of trees inhabited by B. schneideri were found in mixed Scots pine-Norway spruce forests, where the shadowing
was higher than 80%.
4. All dead trees inhabited by B. schneideri had loose and at least slightly fragmented bark. A bark area of 0.08 m2 was found to be sufficient for the survival of
B. schneideri. The critical bark thickness for B. schneideri larvae was 5 mm.
5. The data obtained are important for the optimisation of conservation measures
implemented during forest management operations.
Key words. Boridae, Boros schneideri, conservation, habitat, Pinus sylvestris,
saproxylic beetle.
Introduction
Dead wood is one of the most important substrata for maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems (Esseen et al., 1997). Intensive forest management has reduced the volume of dead wood
and its diversity in many regions (Kaila et al., 1997; Simila et al.,
2003). As a result, due to a lack of suitable breeding substratum,
many saproxylic species (species that are dependent on decaying
wood) have declined, and in the last few decades many have
become threatened (Jonsell et al., 1998; Tikkanen et al., 2006).
Numerous ecological studies aimed at conserving the biodiversity of saproxylic species have been conducted (Ranius & Jansson, 2000; Jonsson et al., 2005; Lindhe et al., 2005; Johansson,
2006; Tikkanen et al., 2007; Alexander, 2008).
Correspondence: Laima Blažyt_e-Čereškien_e, Institute of Ecology of Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, LT-08412 Vilnius21, Lithuania. E-mail: blazyte@ekoi.lt
Success of the European network of conservation areas Natura
2000 depends on broad biological knowledge of the designated
protected species. To devise management plans and develop
protected areas, it is necessary to carry out in-depth analysis of
habitat requirements of the target species. For this purpose, studies of habitat requirements of a few endangered saproxylic beetle
species, such as Osmoderma eremita (Scopoli, 1763) (Cetoniidae)
(Ranius & Nilsson, 1997), Cerambyx cerdo (Linnaeus, 1758)
(Cerambycidae) (Buse et al., 2007), Pytho kolwensis (Sahlberg,
1833) (Pythidae) (Siitonen & Saaristo, 2000) and Cucujus haematodes (Erichson, 1845) (Cucujidae) (Horak et al., 2010) have been
conducted.
Boros schneideri (Panzer, 1796) is the only species in the family
Boridae occurring in Europe (Levkaničovi˛, 2009). It is an endangered saproxylic beetle species listed in Annex 2 of the European
Union Habitat Directive (Council Directive, 2006) and occurs
mostly in the Baltic area. The species has decreased in number
over the past century. B. schneideri is extremely rare in the
2011 The Authors
Insect Conservation and Diversity 2011 The Royal Entomological Society
1
2
_
Laima Blazˇyte-Čeresˇkien
e_ and Vidmantas Karalius
Alpine biogeographical region (Lokality Natura, 2000). In the
Boreal region, it is recorded in Scandinavia (Väisänen et al.,
1993; Siitonen et al., 1999; Hyvärinen et al., 2005) and in the
Baltic countries (Vilks & Telnov, 2003; Ferenca, 2003; Šablevičius, 2003; Sifverberg, 2004; Karalius et al., 2006; Karalius &
Blažyt_e-Čereškien_e, 2009 and other). In the Continental region,
the species has been reported only from Poland (Burakowski
et al., 1987; Kubisz, 2004) and the Czech Republic (Chobot,
2005). In all these regions, the overall assessment of this species
is unfavourable-inadequate or unfavourable-bad (Habitats Directive, 2009).
A study of B. schneideri distribution in Lithuania revealed
that this species is restricted to areas of forest greater than
20 000 ha (Karalius & Blažyt_e-Čereškien_e, 2009). It is likely that
the current nature reserves of suitable habitat are too small for
the long-term survival of this species, therefore adjacent unprotected forests should be managed in a sympathetic manner to
create large blocks of suitable habitat. Saproxylic species may
persist in managed forests only if a sufficient amount of dead
wood is retained during forest management operations (Tikkanen et al., 2007). To manage the habitat for the survival of B. schneideri, it is necessary to know the sorts of wood suitable for this
species as well as the most important substratum properties necessary for its successful reproduction. Unfortunately, data on
habitat requirements and biology of B. schneideri are scarce and
contradicting (Kubisz, 2004; Tikkanen et al., 2007). It is supposed that a generation may take at least 2 years to develop.
The larval nutrition is still poorly studied. Some studies have
indicated that they may be carnivorous and feed on other insect
larvae (Kubisz, 2004). Other researchers have thought that larvae may feed on Aureobasidium mycelium (Uselis, 2008). The
larvae pupate during July and August, with the adult beetles
emerging in October and then overwintering under the bark of a
tree, thereafter to be found until May of the following year
(Uselis, 2008). It is known that dead Scots pine trees provide the
main habitat for this species in mixed and boreal forests (Šablevičius, 2003; Karalius et al., 2006; Tikkanen et al., 2007; Karalius
& Blažyt_e-Čereškien_e, 2009). The aims of this study were to
examine and discuss easily measured characteristics of those
Scots pine trees on which B. schneideri were found beneath the
bark, thereby extending the knowledge regarding habitat
requirements of this threatened species.
Methods and study sites
Study sites
The study area (about 54–55N, 22–25E) is located at the
boundary between the hemiboreal and temperate vegetation
zones in Lithuania (Ahti et al., 1968). Investigations were carried
out in forests dominated by Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Test
plots (0.2–1 ha, depending on the biotope range) were selected
in middle-aged (40- to 60-year-old) and older coniferous forests
dominated by Scots pine (P. sylvestris L.), where Scots pines
constituted the greatest proportion of the total volume of the
growing stock, with smaller proportions of Norway spruce
(Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and birch (Betula spp.). Ground-layer
vegetation was dominated by Vaccinium myrtillus L., V. vitisidaea L., lichens, or moss. Such types of forest are known as B.
schneideri dwelling sites (Karalius et al., 2006; Karalius &
Blažyt_e-Čereškien_e, 2009).
The fieldwork began in May 2006 when 200 dead trees in 13
localities in southern and eastern parts of Lithuania (Var_ena,
Švenčionys, Taurag_e, and Jurbarkas districts) were examined.
In June–October 2007, a further 943 dead trees were checked in
29 localities in southern, eastern and central parts of Lithuania
(Taurag_e, Jurbarkas, Kaunas, Jonava, Lazdijai, Var_ena, Šalčininkai, Trakai, and Švenčionys districts), while in September
2008, an additional 379 dead trees in eight localities in the southern part of Lithuania (Var_ena district) were checked.
Host trees and larvae sampling
Dead standing P. sylvestris trees were selected based on previous studies (Karalius et al., 2006) which indicated that suitable
trees for B. schneideri are greater than 5 cm in diameter at breast
height (about 120 cm above the ground level), with loose and at
least partially fragmented bark and a damp under-bark layer.
All such trees in the plots were registered and checked for the
presence of B. schneideri larvae by temporarily removing up to
1 ⁄ 2 of the bark from the test area (tree trunk surface at a height
of up to 2 m above the ground level). Dead trees with the bark
firmly stuck to the trunk, as well as trees with a dry under-bark
layer were not included into the account. Inspection of a tree
ceased when at least one B. schneideri specimen was detected.
When such specimens were found, the temporarily opened bark
was reattached to the trunk with small nails.
Boros schneideri adults and larvae were identified by analysing
their external morphology (Saalas, 1937; Bei-Bienko, 1965).
Larvae are strongly flattened, subparallel, lightly sclerotized, yellowish and 17–23 mm in length (Levkaničovi˛, 2009). They can
be identified as their abdomen is covered with chitin spikes that
are crown-like and visibly different to larvae of other genera
(Cucujus, Schizotus, Pytho) which are common under the bark
of Scots pine.
The body length and width of the larval head capsule was
measured in field conditions. The measured larvae were released
back onto the host tree. Only trees with B. schneideri larvae (and
not with adults) were assumed to be inhabited by this species
and were used for analysis. As the area of the opened bark varied in different cases, a potential larval density per square meter
of bark was calculated. Bark area calculations were conducted
assuming that the trunk was a 2 m high cylinder.
A number of variables describing the characteristics of dead
trees were recorded. The diameter of every checked tree was
measured. For those trees inhabited by B. schneideri, additional
characteristics recorded were tree height, tree canopy cover, percentage of the remaining bark on the trunk, percentage of the
bark opened during inspection, the number of larvae found, larval position in relation to cardinal points and thickness of the
bark at the larval spot on trees (Table 1).
The modified Braun-Blanquet method was used to describe
the degree of presence of Norway spruce in Scots pine forests
(Balevičien_e, 1991). The cover of Norway spruce was
2011 The Authors
Insect Conservation and Diversity 2011 The Royal Entomological Society, Insect Conservation and Diversity
Habitat requirements of the endangered beetle Boros schneideri
3
Table 1. Variables measured from each of dead trees inhabited by Boros schneideri.
Variable
Range
Explanation
Diameter*
Tree height
5–54 cm
10–35 m
Canopy cover
5–90%
Bark cover
Opened bark
Thickness of
the bark
No. of larvae found
Larval position
10–95%
10–50%
4.7–35.7 mm
Diameter at breast height (1.2 m above the ground level)
Tree height was assessed approximately by actually measuring 1 ⁄ 10 of the tree height, which
was determined from a distance with a measuring stick, and then multiplying it by 10
The sky hemisphere was mentally divided into northern and southern parts. The percentage
of sky overshadowed by trees and bushes was evaluated for both parts
Cover of the remaining bark on the tree trunk at a height of up to 2 m above the ground level
Cover of the opened bark on the tree trunk at a height of up to 2 m above the ground level
Thickness of the bark at the larval position was calculated as the mean of three independent
measurements
Number of larvae found under bark of one trunk
Larval position in relation to cardinal points: N = northern, S = southern, W = western,
E = eastern sides of the trunk
1–9 specimens
N, S, W, E
*The diameter of every checked tree was measured.
determined visually, where: 0–+ = no or rare Norway spruce
trees (1–2), 1–2 = cover 5–25%, 3 and more = cover more
than 25%.
Data relating to the age of stands was obtained from the local
forestry office only in the investigations in 2007 and 2008.
Statistical analysis
Analysis was performed using the StatSoft, Inc. (Tulsa, OK,
USA). The Shapiro–Wilk test was used for normality testing
(Čekanavičius & Murauskas, 2000). The significance of the
stand age and trunk diameter in explaining the probability of a
trunk being inhabited by B. schneideri was studied by logistic
regression. The Spearman correlation was used to estimate the
relationship between different characteristics of a dead tree’s
trunk and larval density.
The Mann–Whitney U test was used to estimate differences in
the percentage of trees inhabited by B. schneideri in Scots pine
forests with different densities of Norway spruce.
Results
Occurrence of B. schneideri
Larvae of B. schneideri were found under the bark of 245 dead
trees from a sample of 1522 studied (16% of cases). The total
number of larvae found was 335, the size of which varied from
small (body length 4.0 mm, width of head capsule 0.54 mm) to
large (body length 28.0 mm, width of head capsule 2.14 mm).
The number of individuals recorded under bark varied from one
to nine. The proportion of trees with one larva was the highest
(71% of cases), as inspection of the tree ceased when at least one
B. schneideri specimen was detected. The area of opened bark
varied from 0.02 m2 to 1.13 m2 in different cases. Therefore, a
potential larval density per square meter of bark at a height of
up to 2 m above the ground level was calculated. The calculated
larval density varied from 1.8 to 44.9 specimens per m2 (average
12.2 0.95 per m2). Larval density negatively correlated with
the area of remaining bark (R = )0.54; P < 0.001) and with
the area of opened bark (R = )0.78; P < 0.001) i.e. the density
of larvae was higher on trees with a smaller area of bark cover.
A bark area of 0.08 m2 was found to be sufficient for the survival
of B. schneideri larva.
The distribution of larvae in relation to cardinal points was
similar: 24% of larvae were recorded on the southern side of the
trunk, 24% on the eastern, 23% on the northern and 29% on
the western. No significant correlations were found between larval density and any other parameters of dead trees.
Host tree characteristics
Boros schneideri larvae were recorded on many kinds of
trunks according to the values of the trunk variables measured
(Table 2). Trees with a diameter of 5–20 cm constituted most
(80.3%) of the potential host trees. The abundance of trees
thicker than 20 cm in diameter was inversely proportional
to their diameter. The narrowest tree on which B. schneideri
larvae were found under the bark had a diameter of 8 cm,
while the thickest was 50 cm in diameter. Most trees with B. schneideri (54.1%) had a diameter of 10–20 cm. However, according to the logistic regression, the probability of a trunk being
inhabited by B. schneideri increased with increasing diameter
(Table 3).
The height of trees with B. schneideri larvae varied from 10 m
to 35 m. The average diameter of inhabited trunks was
18 0.5 m. The greatest proportion (42%) of trees was
15–20 m high. About 7% of dead trees inhabited by B. schneideri were broken snags with their height ranging from 4 to 10 m.
Bark cover in the test area of trees with B. schneideri varied
from 10 to 95%. Less than 10% bark coverage on the trunk was
found to be insufficient for B. schneideri to survive.
Bark thickness at the larval spot varied from 4.7 to 35.7 mm
(average 15.1 mm) (Table 2). About 2% of larvae were found
under bark thinner than 5 mm. Most larvae (77%) were found
under bark 5–20 mm thick. Consequently, bark thickness of
5 mm was considered the minimum for the survival of B. schneideri larvae.
2011 The Authors
Insect Conservation and Diversity 2011 The Royal Entomological Society, Insect Conservation and Diversity
4
_
Laima Blazˇyte-Čeresˇkien
e_ and Vidmantas Karalius
Table 2. Trunk variables in the sample dead trees: number of trunks from which the variable was measured, minimum, maximum, mean
and median values.
Variable
N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Median
Diameter (cm)*
Tree height (m)
Canopy cover (%)
Bark cover (%)
(m2)
Opened bark (%)
(m2)
Thickness of the bark (mm)
245 (944)
165
165
159
8 (5.1)
4
5
10
0.08
10
0.02
4.7
50 (54)
35
90
95
2.84
50
1.13
35.7
19.9 (14.7)
18.3
65
56
0.74
32
0.19
15.1
17 (12.7)
18
70
60
0.67
30
0.14
14.5
159
159
*Figures in parenthesis are for the trunks without Boros schneideri.
Table 3. A logistic regression model including trunk diameter
and stand age which contributed significantly to the probability
of a tree being inhabited by Boros schneideri.
Variables
R2
R
P
Regression equation
Trunk
diameter
Stand age
0.8364
0.9146
0.0006
y = )797.462 + 8.012 · x
0.7184
0.8476
0.0039
y = 13.017 + 5.194 · x
Canopy cover of trees being inhabited by B. schneideri varied
from 5% in clear-cut plots to 90% in mixed pine-spruce forests
(Table 2). Most of the studied trees with B. schneideri (79%)
were in medium-dense and sparse-growth pine forests where the
canopy cover varied from 60 to 80% (average 65 1.2%). Only
6% of trees inhabited by B. schneideri were found in mixed Scots
pine-Norway spruce forests, where the shadowing was higher
than 80%.
The presence of Norway spruce in Scots pine forests was an
important factor affecting probability of trees being inhabited
by B. schneideri. The percentage of dead trees with B. schneideri
larvae in Scots pine forests (Fig. 1) without or with few Norway
spruce trees was statistically higher than in forests where Norway spruce trees covered more than 25% of the area (U = 80,
Z = 2.2, P = 0.026). Thus, the probability of dead trees being
inhabited by B. schneideri seems to be higher in Scots pine forests
without shadowing by Norway spruce trees.
The age of stands in the study areas varied from 40 to
127 years (average age 71 2.2 years). Most trees with B. schneideri (70%) were in 40- to 80-year-old forests. Only 30% of
dead trees were in forests older than 80 years. However, the
logistic regression showed that the probability of a dead tree
being inhabited by B. schneideri increased with increasing stand
age (Table 3).
Discussion
Boros schneideri is usually described as a species of relict primeval forests inhabiting old and thick dead trees (Telnov, 2003;
Kubisz, 2004; European rarities in Estonia: Boros schneideri,
2007). Our data provide a substantial basis for the revision of
Fig. 1. Probability of dead Scots pine trees being inhabited by
Boros schneideri in Scots pine forests with different density of
Norway spruce. The cover of Norway spruce was determined by
Braun-Blanquet method, where 0–+ = no or few trees,
1–2 = 5–25% cover, 3 and more = more than 25% cover. Different letters (a, b) denote statistically significant differences
(P < 0.05; Mann–Whitney U test).
this view. It is true that B. schneideri prefers breeding on thick
trees, which could be evidenced by the results of logistic regression. A greater B. schneideri population size on thicker trees
might be attributed to the bark area, which is generally greater
on thick trees than on thin trees. However, beetles can also inhabit relatively thin trees, which are 10–15 cm in diameter. As the
abundance of dead trees with a diameter of 10–20 cm in managed forests was significantly higher than the abundance of
thicker trees, thin dead trees in this 10–20 cm diameter range
hosted the greatest proportion of B. schneideri population. In literature, it is indicated that tree size influences species richness of
saproxylic beetles (Ranius & Jansson, 2000) and that trunk
diameter can positively correlate with density of some saproxylic
insect species and negatively with some other species (Lindhe
et al., 2005). Our findings emphasize the importance of
2011 The Authors
Insect Conservation and Diversity 2011 The Royal Entomological Society, Insect Conservation and Diversity
Habitat requirements of the endangered beetle Boros schneideri
comparatively thin trees as breeding substrata for B. schneideri.
Consequently, dead trees with a diameter of 10–20 cm should be
regarded as an important dead wood resource in B. schneideri
conservation projects.
According to Buse et al. (2007), bark thickness of trees is
one of the significant predictors for the presence of saproxylic
beetle. Our study shows that bark 7 mm thick provides ample
conditions for the survival of B. schneideri larva in the forest.
Optimal conditions for saproxylic beetle larvae would probably
be large trunks with thick bark and phloem, these creating
better conditions for larval development over a longer time
period (Siitonen & Saaristo, 2000). However, the greatest proportion of the B. schneideri population in Lithuania seems to
occur under middle thickness bark, because most large forests
suitable for B. schneideri (Karalius & Blažyt_e-Čereškien_e, 2009)
today consist of thin and medium diameter trees with a middle
bark thickness.
Boros schneideri larvae were found only under the bark of
trees with loose bark, where the process of bark loss had already
started. The density of B. schneideri larvae was higher under the
bark of trees with smaller areas of remaining bark. This can be
explained by the specificity of the bark loss process, which is usually accelerated by woodpeckers and in most cases proceeds
from the top of the trunk downwards, because bark at the top is
thinner and easier to remove. Larvae of B. schneideri develop
under the bark for several years. As a result of bark loss, they
are forced to congregate in smaller under-bark areas.
Species richness and the number of red-listed saproxylic beetles are found to be significantly higher in sun-exposed trees
(Lindhe & Lindelöw, 2004; Lindhe et al., 2005). The impact of
canopy cover on a dead tree’s suitability for B. schneideri was
found to be very important too. B. schneideri is defined as a type
of species that lives in pine snags and favours warm and sunny
stands (Tikkanen et al., 2007). Our data confirm that the species
often inhabits 100% of dead biodiversity trees remaining in
clear-cuts and maximally exposed to the sun. Alongside light
preference, B. schneideri also demonstrates considerable tolerance to shady places: the species is able to breed under the bark
of dead trees in medium-dense pine forests. Due to the scarcity
of dead trees in open places, most of the population lives under
the bark of dead trees in the shaded conditions of medium-dense
and sparse-growth pine forests. However, dead trees are quite
rarely inhabited by B. schneideri in dense Scots pine forests, especially with higher Norway spruce densities.
The data obtained demonstrate which characteristics of dead
wood have the highest value for B. schneideri conservation and
are important for the optimization of conservation measures
during forest management operations.
To sum up, dead Scots pine trees with a diameter exceeding
10 cm, with loose and at least slightly fragmented bark, which
stand in places with shadowing conditions varying from medium-dense pine forests with low Norway spruce densities to fully
sun-exposed clear-cuts, are suitable breeding substrata for this
species. Such trees should be retained during forest management
operations, especially during thinning and cleaning. When planning conservation measures, special attention should be paid to
the finding that, though B. schneideri beetles prefer breeding on
thick and old trees, the main part of the population in Lithuania
5
occurs under the bark of dead trees with a diameter of 10–20 cm
in comparatively young medium-dense and sparse-growth pine
forests. Further research is needed to better understand if the
probabilities of dead tree being inhabited by B. schneideri differ
between forest types.
Acknowledgement
We thank Mr Vytautas Uselis and Ms Asta Uselien_e, ecologists
at Viešvil_e Strict Nature Reserve, Mr Vincas Slavickas, a biologist at Dzukija National Park, Dr. Bronius Šablevičius, an ecologist at Aukštaitija National Park, and Mr Audrius Aliukonis
and Mr Romas Ferenca, ecologists at Labanoras Regional Park
for their kind of assistance during fieldwork. We also thank Ms
Laima Monkien_e, Ms Virginija Žalien_e and Mr Jos Stratford
for corrections in the English version of the text, as well as the
Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania for official permission to perform investigations into the ecology of
Boros schneideri, a species listed in the Red Data Book of Lithuania. The study was financed by the Lithuanian State Science
and Studies Foundation, Contract No T-118 ⁄ 07.
References
Ahti, T., Hämet-Ahti, L. & Jalas, J. (1968) Vegetation zones and
their sections in northwestern Europe. Annales Botanici Fennici,
5, 69–211.
Alexander, K.N.A. (2008) Tree biology and saproxylic Coleoptera: issues of definitions and conservation language. Revue
d’Ecologie: La Terre et la Vie, 63, 1–5.
Balevičien_e, J. (1991) Syntaxonomical and Phytogeographical
Structure of Vegetation in Lithuania. Mokslas, Vilnius, Lithuania (in Russian).
Bei-Bienko, G.J. (1965) Key of Insects From European Part of the
USSR, 2, Nauka, Moscow, Russia (in Russian).
Burakowski, B., Mroczkowski, M. & Stefańska, J. (1987) Beetles
– Coleoptera. Cucujoidea. Catalogue of Polish Fauna. PWN,
Warszawa, Poland, 23, 14, 1–309 (in Polish).
Buse, J., Schröder, B. & Assmann, T. (2007) Modelling habitat
and spatial distribution of an endangered longhorn beetle – a
case study for saproxylic insect conservation. Biological Conservation, 137, 372–381.
Čekanavičius, V. & Murauskas, G. (2000) Statistic and its Application, Part 1. TEV Publishers, Vilnius, Lithuania (in Lithuanian).
Chobot, K. (2005) Preparation of pSCIs for insect species. Ochrana Prˇı´rody, 60 (10), 294–297 (in Czech).
Esseen, P.A., Ehnström, B., Ericson, L. & Sjöberg, K. (1997)
Boreal forests. Ecological Bulletins, 46, 16–47.
European rarities in Estonia: Boros schneideri (2007) Eesti Loodus (‘Estonian Nature’) 2007 ⁄ 2. <http://www.loodusajakiri.ee> 6th December 2007.
Ferenca, R. (2003) New and rare for Lithuania beetle (Coleoptera) species registered in 1997-2002. New and rare for Lithuania insect species, 15, 32–36 (in Lithuanian).
Habitats Directive Article 17 Reporting. European Topic Centre
on Biological Diversity. 13 July 2009. <http://eea.eionet.
europa.eu/Public/irc/eionet-circle/habitats-art17report/library?l=
/datasheets/species> 8th March 2011.
2011 The Authors
Insect Conservation and Diversity 2011 The Royal Entomological Society, Insect Conservation and Diversity
6
_
Laima Blazˇyte-Čeresˇkien
e_ and Vidmantas Karalius
Horak, J., Zaitsev, A.A. & Vavrova, E. (2010) Ecological requirements of a rare saproxylic beetle Cucujus haematodes – the beetles’ stronghold on the edge of its distribution area. Insect
Conservation and Diversity, DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-458X.2010.
00102.x.
Hyvärinen, E., Kouki, J., Martikainen, P. & Lappalainen, H.
(2005) Short-term effects of controlled burning and green-tree
retention on beetle (Coleoptera) assemblages in managed boreal
forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 212, 315–332.
Johansson, T. (2006) The conservation of saproxylic beetles in
Boreal forest: importance of forest management and dead wood
characteristics. Doctoral dissertation. Swedish University of
Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Jonsell, M., Weslien, J. & Ehnström, B. (1998) Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7, 749–764.
Jonsson, B.G., Kruys, N. & Ranius, T. (2005) Ecology of species
living on dead wood – lessons for dead wood management.
Silva Fennica, 39, 289–309.
Kaila, L., Martikainen, P. & Punttila, P. (1997) Dead trees left in
clear-cuts benefit saproxylic Coleoptera adapted to natural disturbances in boreal forest. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6, 1–18.
Karalius, V. & Blažyt_e-Čereškien_e, L. (2009) Distribution of
Boros schneideri (Panzer, 1796) (Coleoptera, Boridae) in Lithuania. Journal of Insect Conserv, 13, 347–353.
Karalius, V., Ferenca, R., Uselis, V., Jukonien_e, I. & Šablevičius,
B. (2006) Findings of Boros schneideri (Panzer, 1796) in 2006.
New and Rare for Lithuania Insect Species, 17, 22–24.
Kubisz, D. (2004) Boros schneideri (Panzer, 1796). Polish Red
Data Book of Animals. Institute of Nature Conservation PAS,
Krakow, Poland. <http://www.iop.krakow.pl/pckz> 17th
October 2009.
Levkaničovi˛, Z. (2009) Molecular phylogeny of the Superfamily
Tenebrionoidea (Coleoptera: Cucujiformia). PhD thesis, Plack_z
Univesity in Olomouc, Olomouc Czech Republic.
Lindhe, A. & Lindelöw, Å. (2004) Cut high stumps of spruce,
birch, aspen and oak as breeding substrates for saproxylic beetles. Forest Ecology and Management, 203, 1–20.
Lindhe, A., Lindelöw, Å. & Åsenblad, N. (2005) Saproxylic beetles in standing dead wood density in relation to substrate sunexposure and diametre. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14,
3033–3053.
Lokality Natura 2000. Natura 2000 Sites. <http://www.
sopsr.sk> 6th December 2007.
Ranius, T. & Jansson, N. (2000) The influence of forest regrowth,
original canopy cover and tree size on saproxylic beetles associated with old oaks. Biological Conservation, 95, 85–94.
Ranius, T. & Nilsson, S.G. (1997) Habitat of Osmoderma eremita
Scop. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), a beetle living in hollow
trees. Journal of Insect Conservation, 1, 193–204.
Saalas, U. (1937) Die Larve von Boros Schneideri Panz. (Col.,
Boridae). Annales Entomologici Fennici, 3, 198–203.
Šablevičius, B. (2003) New and rare for Lithuania beetle (Coleoptera) species. New and Rare for Lithuania Insect Species, 15,
11–24.
Sifverberg, H. (2004) Enumeratio nova Coleopterorum Fennoscandiae, Daniae et Baltiae. Sahlbergia, 9, 1–111.
Siitonen, J., Punttila, P. & Koskela, M. (1999) Effects of local
and regional host-tree density on saproxylic beetle assemblages
on dead pines. Habitat Loss: Ecological, Evolutionary and
Genetic Consequences. Helsinki, 7–12 September, p. 37.
Siitonen, J. & Saaristo, L. (2000) Habitat requirements and conservation of Pytho kolwensis, a beetle species of old-growth
boreal forest. Biological Conservation, 94, 211–220.
Simila, M., Kouki, J. & Marikainen, P. (2003) Saproxylic beetles
in managed and seminatural Scots pine forests: quality of dead
wood matters. Forest Ecology and Management, 174, 365–381.
Telnov, D. (2003) Saproxylic Latvia – the situation, species diversity and possibilities. Proceedings of 2nd Pan-European Conference on Saproxylic Beetles. People’s Trust for Endangered
Species, London, pp. 39–40.
Tikkanen, O.-P., Heinonen, T., Kouki, J. & Matero, J. (2007)
Habitat suitability models of saproxylic red-listed boreal forest
species in long-term matrix management: Cost-effective measures for multi-species conservation. Biological Conservation,
140, 359–372.
Tikkanen, O.-P., Martikainen, P., Hyvärinen, E., Junninen, K. &
Kouki, J. (2006) Red-listed boreal forest species of Finland:
associations with forest structure, tree species, and decaying
wood. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 43, 373–383.
Uselis, V. (2008) What we know about Boros schneideri protected by the EU habitats Directive? <http://www.birdlife.lt/
index.php/gamtos-klase/menesio-tema/kirmvabalis> 15th February 2009 (in Lithuanian).
Väisänen, R., Biström, O. & Heliövaara, K. (1993) Sub-cortical
Coleoptera in dead pines and spruces: is primeval species composition maintained in managed forests? Biodiversity and Conservation, 2, 95–113.
Vilks, K. & Telnov, D. (2003) Notes on recent findings of Boros
schneideri (Panzer, 1795) (Coleoptera, Boridae) in Latvia. Latvijas Entomologs, 40, 63.
Council Directive 92 ⁄ 43 ⁄ EEC of 21 May 1992 on the Conservation
of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora. Amended by
Council Directive 2006 ⁄ 105 ⁄ EC of 20 November 2006.
<http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/> 8th March 2011.
Accepted 29 March 2011
Editor: Simon R. Leather
Associate editor: Donald Quicke
2011 The Authors
Insect Conservation and Diversity 2011 The Royal Entomological Society, Insect Conservation and Diversity